English Teachers

A forum for teachers of English in Egypt



    Posts : 88
    Join date : 2009-02-12
    Age : 57
    Location : International Territory


    Post by Admin on Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:05 pm


    By: Essam Wahba

    Although microteaching has long been used as a
    professional development tool in in-service teacher
    training programs, teacher trainees seldom take this training seriously. At least this is the situation in Egypt. This attitude greatly diminishes the usefulness of microteaching, which can be beneficial.

    Microteaching helps teachers to better understand the processes of teaching and learning. It provides
    teachers with ample opportunities to explore and
    reflect on their own and others' teaching styles and
    to acquire new teaching techniques.

    Microteaching can be defined as a training context in which a teacher's situation has been reduced in scope or simplified in some systematic ways. There are three ways in which teaching may be scaled down:

    1. The teacher's task may be simplified and made very specific.

    2. The length of the lesson may be shortened.
    3. The size of class may be reduced.

    This article addresses microteaching as an in-service tool, and how school-based microteaching can be beneficial to all involved in the learning and
    teaching processes.

    Origin and development

    Microteaching, as a training technique, began at
    Stanford University in the early 1970s. It was first
    applied to teaching science, but later it was
    introduced to language teaching. The theoretical basis for the Stanford approach was initially related to the psychological theory of behaviorism. However, it is more valid to see microteaching as a technique for professional reflection than as a technique for shaping behavior.

    Why microteaching

    Besides being an effective technique for professional growth, microteaching, as a tool for reflection, helps teachers scrutinize their own teaching in order to discover their strengths and weaknesses. Reflecting on their own teaching styles enables teachers to focus on certain areas of teaching and to view them from different perspectives.

    It also makes teachers conscious of developing their own skills and strategies in order to understand their teaching. Through microteaching teachers are able to pursue self-initiated, self-directed, and self-observed growth. This growth comes about because teachers are able to criticize, either positively or negatively, their own work.

    Stages of microteaching

    There are four distinct stages of microteaching. In
    the briefing, teachers receive information on the
    skill to be practiced and the method to be used.
    During the teaching stage, the trainee teaches the
    microlesson, and if possible, the micro-lesson is
    videotaped or audiorecorded. In the analysis and
    discussion period, the trainee's microlesson is
    reviewed, discussed, analyzed, and evaluated. Finally, in the reteaching stage, the trainee reteaches the microlesson, applying those points raised during the discussion and analysis.

    Preparing a microlesson

    The microlesson can be prepared by an individual or a group of teacher trainees. The objective and
    procedures of the microlessons should be clear. A
    variety of aids may be used to facilitate teaching the microlessons. These may include cards, actions,
    gestures, and drawings on the board. The lesson should last from five to ten minutes.

    Teaching a microlesson

    This is the interactive stage of microteaching where the trainee puts into practice what the group has planned. The teacher's task in microteaching is to practice one skill at a time. The size of the class is usually fewer than ten students, sometimes only four or five. Students may be real students or fellow trainees.

    Microteaching should be in a school setting, because it allows teachers to use real students. Also, school-based microteaching creates a positive
    atmosphere among participants.

    Although the lesson is short, it should generate
    useful discussions. During the teaching, fellow
    trainees take notes that they can use during
    reflective discussions. This is especially useful if
    the students are also trainees because the experience provides insights into learning problems. To reduce the pressure on the teacher, the role of the supervisors should be minimized. They should not interfere with the microlesson in any way.

    Observation during the microlesson is a learning
    experience. Fellow teachers should prepare for this
    task by selecting a focus and purpose, and a method of data collection and by cooperating with those involved.

    Following up the microlesson

    The follow-up should include analyzing, discussing,
    and interpreting the data and the experiences
    acquired, and reflecting on the new experiences.


    Some people argue that microteaching is both a risky and costly procedure. It is risky in that trainees or inservice teachers may be exposed to criticism by their colleagues and/or supervisors. There are also costs involved both in the resources that may be used and the amount of time the microteaching absorbs. However, microteaching should be considered a positive experience because it aids in the gradual development
    of professional expertise and minimizes the risk of
    failure in the classroom.


    Richards, J. and C. Lockhart. 1994. Reflective
    teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.

    Wallace, M. 1991. Training foreign language teachers.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Wajnryb, R. 1992. Classroom observation tasks.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Essam Wahba

      Current date/time is Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:51 am